Demokrasi Liberal dan Rekonstruksi PAI Kontemporer: Menimbang Ulang Akar Historis dan Arah Transformasi
Main Article Content
Abstract
Liberal democracy emphasizes individual freedom, public participation, and respect for differences of opinion. In education, these values are reflected through dialogic and participatory learning. However, various studies indicate that Islamic Religious Education (IRE) is still dominated by teacher-centered approaches, resulting in limited student participation in the learning process. This condition reveals a gap between democratic values and contemporary IRE practices. This study aims to analyze the relevance of liberal democratic values in Islamic Religious Education and to formulate the direction for the reconstruction of contemporary IRE from the perspective of liberal democracy. The findings indicate that liberal democratic values, such as freedom of thought, active participation, tolerance, and respect for differences, are relevant to the principles consultation (shura), justice, and responsibility. Therefore, the reconstruction of Islamic Religious Education should be directed toward more dialogic, participatory, humanistic, and student-centered learning to address the challenges of contemporary society while maintaining the fundamental values of Islam.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Amini, A., Nurjannah, A., Madhani, V., Chintya, Y., & Mardani, N. (2023). Pembelajaran HOTS dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Islam. Journal on Education, 5(4), 11000–11011. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2023
Asikin, M. (2024). Penguatan Literasi Digital dalam Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 121–154.
Azra, A. (2019). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan Modernisasi di Tengah Tantangan Milenium III. Jakarta: Kencana.
Damayanti, D., Prasetyo, R., & Lestari, N. (2023). Pembelajaran Dialogis dan Partisipatif dalam Pengembangan Pendidikan Abad ke-21. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 12(2), 121–154.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). Triangulation 2.0*. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Latifah, N., & Khoiri, A. (2025). Implementasi Pembelajaran Partisipatif dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam untuk Penguatan Karakter Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 122–154.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Pendekatan Kualitatif dalam Penelitian Sosial. Rineka Cipta.
Nata, A. (2020). Pendidikan Islam di Era Milenial. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Nurahman, A. A., Fadilah, S. I., Cahyani, R. P., Hadistia, N., & Siregar, N. F. (2024). Developing School Laboratory Activities Design by Utilizing Android-Based Digital Applications in Savanna Ecosystem of Ranca Upas. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(3), 121–154.
Oktorio, R., Firmansyah, D., Setiawan, A., & Kurniawan, B. (2025). Demokrasi, Pluralisme, dan Rekonstruksi Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer. Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Masyarakat, 14(2), 151–178.
Pasla, B. N. (2024). Sejarah Demokrasi Liberal di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 15(1), 121–154.
Pratiwi, D., Ramadhani, S., Fauziah, N., & Putra, M. (2024). Literasi Digital dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Era Society 5.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer, 8(1), 52–86.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuatitatif, Kualitatif dan (R&D) (kedua). Alfabeta.
Zed, M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.